kaaatie: (SGA: McKay - Thoughtful)
[personal profile] kaaatie
I have a hypothetical question related to a conversation that I've been having...

Let's presume that there's a group of prisoners (let's say 10 of them). An executioner puts them all in a position where each individual has a 50% chance of surviving (and a 50% chance of dying). There's no chance of escape, and no chance of rescue. However, if one of the prisoners volunteers to take the 50% chance of dying, then the other prisoners are all guaranteed to survive. The question is: do you think one of them would volunteer? Do you think the size of the group would influence the outcome?

Now, a different example.

A group of people are working in an office, and someone comes in and offers them all a chance to be given a new car (a corvette). Each individual has a 50% chance of getting a new car. However, if one person agrees to take the 50% chance at the car, then everyone else is guaranteed to get a new car. Do you think someone would volunteer? Do you think people would be more or less likely to volunteer in this example versus the other example?

I think this seems like the perfect opportunity for a poll:

[Poll #1194893]

(no subject)

Date: 2008-05-31 04:40 am (UTC)
ext_19751: Due South: Fraser - white background (Default)
From: [identity profile] kaaatie.livejournal.com
Yeah, I'd like to think that someone who didn't need a car (or someone was just genuinely nice) would volunteer in the car example. With the prisoner example, there are so many variables that it makes it hard to decide what would happen. I'd like to think that someone would volunteer though...

Profile

kaaatie: (Default)
kaaatie

May 2009

S M T W T F S
     1 2
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31      

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags